AKTA SETEM PERINTAH DUTI SETEM (PEREMITAN) PADA menjalankan kuasa yang diberikan oleh subseksyen 80(2) Akta. Sila maklum mengikut Seksyen 57(f) Akta Setem , bayaran balik duti setem boleh dipertimbangkan sekiranya. 20 sesuatu suratcara yang. [EBOOKS] Akta Setem PDF Book is the book you are looking for, Duti Setem Ke Atas Surat Cara Perjanjian Kontrak Pembinaan.
|Published (Last):||20 February 2004|
|PDF File Size:||19.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.26 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Pleadings – Counterclaim – Amendment – Application to amend statement of defence by adding counterclaim – Filing of amendments – Whether statute barred – Whether insertion of counterclaim would turn the suit from one character into a suit of another and inconsistent character – Whether counterclaims based on same setrm as pleaded in original statement of defence – Whether appellants would suffer prejudice – Limitation Acts. Motor insurance – Insurer’s liability – Policy excluding liability to any person other than a passenger carried in pursuance dufi a contract of employment – Deceased suffering injuries in the course of travelling in insured’s lorry – Whether deceased an employee of insured – Deceased a mere passenger – Insurer not liable Letchumanan Gopal v.
Law Yew Kwan lwn. Money Services Business Bill Buildings – Demolition – Local Government Acts. Renewable Energy Act Loan of money – Serem to recover – Plaintiff lending money to defendant company in which she was the assistant aota manager – Plaintiff contending loan not subject to operation of Limitation Ordinance Cap 49 Sarawak – Whether limitation excluded by shareholders’ resolution – Whether defendant company bound by resolution of holding company – Whether s.
Cukai pendapatan – Tuntutan – Tuntutan bayaran cukai belum dibayar – Sama ada penyerahan notis taksiran kepada defendan sempurna – Sama ada cukai yang ditaksirkan menjadi genap masanya dan kena dibayar – Sama ada mahkamah forum yang sesuai untuk memutuskan jumlah cukai dan taksiran akat dibangkitkan – Sama ada taksiran-taksiran adalah konklusif dan muktamad – Sama ada plaintif membuktikan tuntutan terhadap defendan atas imbangan kebarangkalian – Akta Cukai Pendapatanss.
Road Transport Amendment Act Entertainments Duty Exemption No 12 Order Letters of administration – Appointment of caveator – Appeal against appointment of caveator as joint administrator – Whether petitioners and caveator lawful next of kin of deceased and fell within meaning of s. Domestic Violence Amendment Bill Shares – Agreement – Whether defendant held shares on constructive trust for plaintiff – Whether plaintiff could claim equity against defendant in respect of dividends received by defendant – Defendant did not pay purchase price – Whether retention of dividends by defendant amount to unjust enrichment.
Sentence – Appeal against sentence – Principles of sentencing – Plea of guilty – Deterrence – Punishment – First conviction in State of Kedah – Refusal to undergo rehabilitation as further contempt of order of court – Drug Dependants Dutu and Rehabilitation Acts.
Contract of service – Test for determining whether a person is under a contract of service – Whether person is part and parcel of an organization – Whether person is employed as part of the business Letchumanan Gopal v. Sdtem Chew Yin v.
Galaxy Energy Technologies Sdn Bhd v. Kurnia Insurans Malaysia Berhad v. Lau Lee Sieng v. Stamp duty – Refund – Application by purchaser under a terminated sale and purchase agreement for refund of duty paid under s.
Action – Dismissal of – Pleading – Statement of claim adverting to cause of action in negligence – Admission by plaintiff that there was no cause of action in tort against defendant – Effect and repercussion – Whether cause of action in tort abandoned – Whether substratum of claim extirpated – Whether claim to be dismissed Perwira Affin Bank Bhd v. Interest – Judgment debt – Plaintiff claimed interest of one per centum per month pursuant to a settlement agreement – Whether contrary to Rules of the High CourtO.
SEARCH FOR PERINTAH DUTI SETEM PEREMITANNO 32010 P U A 475 AKTA SETEM 1949 PDF
Income tax – Companies – Applicant’s sole business to operate and maintain a college – College education provided in exchange for payment – Income not used for charitable or beneficent purpose – Whether applicant exempted from tax – Profits could not be distributed to members – Surplus used solely to promote applicant’s objectives – Whether applicant profit oriented organization – Income Tax Exemption No.
Pleadings – Counterclaim – Filing of counterclaim – Whether counterclaim deemed to be a separate action – Limitation Acts. Judgments and orders – Judgment in default – Setting aside – Whether judgment in default irregular – Writ of summon unsigned, unsealed and undated – Manner of indorsement of writ – Whether vitiated service of writ – Whether prejudice caused to defendants – Filing memorandum of appearance – Whether defendants waived right to challenge validity of writ – Plaintiff claimed severally and jointly against defendants – Whether plaintiff allowed to claim excess of the sum owed – Whether there were grounds to set aside judgment in default MIDF Amanah Ventures Sdn Bhd v.
Supplementary Supply Act Negligence – Duty of care – Breach of – Defective product causing injury to plaintiff – Whether defendant’s duty of care to ensure product had SIRIM approval – Whether plea of contributory negligence rejected – Whether defendants found to be liable Sundram Veeriah v. Not Yet In force.
Arbitration Amendment Act Teh Boon Long v. Declaration Of Dangerous Pest Vicarious liability – Eetem accident – Deceased suffering injuries in the course of travelling in insured’s lorry – Whether deceased was being carried in insured vehicle as a mere passenger – Whether deceased being carried in vehicle in pursuance of a contract of employment with the insured Letchumanan Gopal v.
Notification Of Exemption Under Section 11e. Employment contract – Wrongful termination – Termination of employment of 1st respondent, a foreigner – Whether 1st respondent a workman within Industrial Relations Act – Whether applicant employer for 1st respondent – Whether Industrial Court had jurisdiction to hear the matter – Whether ajta contract illegal Nacap Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd v.
Club – Member – Cessation of plaintiff’s membership – Plaintiff’s past criminal convictions prior to his club dutk – Whether r. Wartha Radju Munisamy v.
Insurance Exemption No 2 Order Get this bulletin as email by going to http: Charge – No offence disclosed – Defective charge – Charge under s. Trustees – Breach of trust – Construction of trust deed – 1st defendant holding shares in trust for plaintiff – Shares transferred to third parties without consent of cestui cue trust – Whether 1st defendant liable – Whether third parties equally liable Lim Chew Yin v.
Not Yet In Force.
Hukuman – Kesetimpalan – Rompakan – Rompakan malam hari oleh warganegara asing – Hukuman sepuluh tahun penjara dan sepuluh sebatan rotan – Sama ada agak berlebihan – Sama ada perlu diganggui sekadarnya – Kanun Keseksaan, s.
Fisheries Amendment Bill Syarikat Pendidikan Staffield Bhd v. Industrial Court – Jurisdiction – Termination of employment of 1st respondent, a foreigner – Whether Court had jurisdiction to hear the matter – Whether applicant had demonstrated findings of fact by court palpably perverse – Whether 1st respondent should be afforded protection against unfair dismissal in the event employment contract void Nacap Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd v.
See Hua Daily News Berhad. Res judicata – Issue estoppel – Same issues canvassed in liability action and recovery action – Motor vehicle xkta claim – Liability of vehicle owner established in liability action – Insurer in recovery action seeking to refute liability by reference to exclusion clause in policy dut Whether res judicata barred relitigation on liability issue – Whether liability and recovery actions distinct from each other Letchumanan Gopal v. Nacap Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd v.
Drug Dependants Treatment and Rehabilitation Act – Section 20 1 a – Contravention of conditions imposed – Refusal to follow programme for treatment and rehabilitation – Sentence of two years’ imprisonment – Appeal against sentence – Whether sentence manifestly excessive.